Revolutionary research reveals that everything the beauty industry taught us about flattering colours is fundamentally wrong.

For decades, we've been categorising ourselves into seasonal colour palettes&mdash;Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter&mdash;building wardrobes around whether our skin runs "warm" or "cool." But groundbreaking research from universities across three continents suggests we've been looking in entirely the wrong place.
When scientists studied what actually drives colour attraction, they discovered something remarkable: people don't unconsciously respond to skin undertones at all. They're drawn to something far more precise&mdash;eye colour.

Tamara Orlova

This revelation isn't just revolutionary; it's deeply personal. The traditional colour analysis that promised to unlock your most flattering palette may have been pointing you in completely the wrong direction. This autumn, as we harvest new understanding of personal style, we're not just talking about switching up your colours. We're exploring the actual psychology of attraction and why certain shades make you magnetic whilst others leave you forgettable.

Here's what happened. In 2021, researchers at the University of St. Andrews thought they'd do a simple study to back up what everyone "knows" about colour&mdash;that cool-toned people look better in cool colours, warm-toned people look better in warm colours. Basic stuff, right?
They gathered about 100 people and showed them photos of twelve women&mdash;half with pale, cool-toned skin, half with golden, warm-toned skin. Simple task: pick the most flattering clothing colour for each woman based on her skin tone.
Initially, it looked like traditional colour theory was right. People chose blue for the pale women, orange for the golden-skinned ones. Case closed, theory proven... except for one peculiar thing.
Instead of the gentle curves you'd expect&mdash;some people liking navy, others preferring sky blue, others choosing teal - the results showed sharp, dramatic spikes. People weren't choosing from a range of blues. They were all zeroing in on one very specific blue. Same thing with orange. Not coral, not peach, not burnt orange&mdash;one very particular orange.
Even stranger? There were random spikes that made no sense. Some pale women were getting matched with orange. Some golden-skinned women were being paired with blue. The researchers admitted they were baffled.
So they got suspicious and designed an even more clever experiment. What if they digitally swapped the skin tones? Took the pale skin and put it on the golden-skin group, and vice versa. If skin tone was really driving these choices, the results should flip completely, right?
Wrong. Spectacularly wrong.
The blue-eyed women kept getting matched with blue, no matter what skin they were given. The brown-eyed women kept getting orange-red, regardless of their new skin tone. People were completely ignoring the skin and matching colours to the eyes instead.
Here's the revelation: when the researchers went back and actually looked at their original groups, the "cool-toned" women were nearly all blue or grey-eyed. The "warm-toned" women were nearly all brown-eyed. For decades, we'd been attributing eye-colour preferences to skin tone and building an entire industry around the wrong thing.

Beyond Blue, Brown, Green: Your Real Eye Colour

Most people believe they know their eye colour, but here's the uncomfortable truth: up to 60% of us are wrong. This isn't vanity - it's the foundation of understanding which colours will genuinely make you more attractive.
The problem is that we've been using playground categories (blue, brown, green) when reality is far more sophisticated. What you think are "blue" eyes might actually be blue-grey. What you call "brown" could be hazel. And these distinctions aren't academic; they completely change which colours will make you look magnetic.

The Cool Eye Family
True blue eyes are genuinely rare - they're the clear, bright blues you see in children's eyes, and most adults who think they have blue eyes actually have something more complex. Most "blue" eyes are actually blue-grey, which appears darker and has completely different colour requirements.
Grey eyes present their own mysteries. They might look similar to blue-grey at first glance, but they're inherently muted and need equally soft colour companions&mdash;not the bright, clear colours often recommended for "cool" types.

The Complex Middle Ground
This is where it gets fascinating. Blue-grey eyes with yellow rings around the pupil create an entirely different category. That golden ring can be barely visible or dramatically prominent, and it shifts everything. The more prominent the golden ring, the more these eyes work with sea-foam greens and sage tones rather than pure blues.
Similarly, grey-green eyes with yellow flecks look remarkably similar but contain no blue whatsoever. The golden flecks integrate more harmoniously because they're working with compatible tones. These eyes thrive in what we might call "warm grey-green&rdquo;- think spring rain or sophisticated olive.

The Warm Spectrum
Pure green eyes are genuinely rare and represent the first category where colours become fully saturated rather than muted. These eyes can handle bright, clear greens mixed with yellows and even touches of pure emerald.
Hazel eyes - perhaps the most misunderstood category - bridge green and brown territory whilst maintaining significant colour complexity. These aren't just "brownish-green"; they're light-toned with golden flecks that work beautifully with brass, yellow-green, and golden colours.

The Brown Family
Even brown eyes aren't simply "brown." Light brown eyes are genuinely bright, comparable to blue eyes in lightness but saturated with warm colour rather than grey-muted. The dominant colour is yellow-orange, making these eyes natural partners for autumn's golden spectrum.
Medium brown eyes tend toward red-orange, whilst the very darkest brown eyes shift toward red-violet. This distinction explains why some brown-eyed people look magnificent in warm autumn colours whilst others require the deeper, cooler tones of winter palettes.

The St. Andrews research uncovered another crucial element: hair colour acts as a modifier, creating what amounts to a personal colour equation. The discovery emerged when researchers noticed their "cool" and "warm" groups differed not just in eye colour, but in hair colour&mdash;the blue-eyed group was predominantly blonde, whilst the brown-eyed group was largely brunette.
When they digitally swapped hair colours - giving dark hair to blue-eyed subjects and blonde hair to brown-eyed one - the optimal clothing colours shifted. Blue-eyed subjects with dark hair were matched with deeper, more saturated blues. Brown-eyed subjects with light hair were paired with softer versions of their red-orange family colours.
The pattern revealed a simple relationship: blonde hair lightens and softens the eye colour's ideal clothing match, whilst brunette hair deepens and intensifies it. This explains why someone with blue-grey eyes might find their colours shift dramatically after going from brunette to blonde. The soft blue-greys that looked perfect with dark hair suddenly appear too strong, whilst paler, more ethereal tones begin to work beautifully.

The research suggests our optimal colours follow a mathematical relationship: eye colour + hair colour modifier = ideal shade. A brunette with medium brown eyes can handle intense burgundies because their dark hair supports these strong colours, whilst their eye colour harmonises with them. The same person with blonde hair would need softer wine tones instead.
Understanding this relationship explains why colours that worked beautifully in youth may feel wrong later in life, and why dramatic hair colour changes often require wardrobe adjustments. As hair lightens naturally with age, optimal clothing colours generally become softer. As hair darkens, colours can handle more intensity.

Whilst eye colour determines our optimal hues and hair colour modifies their intensity, there's a third element that creates what researchers call the "radiance effect." Scientists at the University of Osaka discovered this whilst investigating how lip colour affects our perception of facial brightness.
In their study, researchers presented participants with images of four women, digitally manipulating only the lip colour. The lips appeared in natural tones, bright red, purple, or were left completely colourless. Participants viewed each face alongside patches of different skin tones and were asked to identify which face appeared brighter and more luminous.
The results were remarkable: faces with red lips were consistently perceived as having brighter, more luminous skin than identical faces with purple lips or no lip colour at all. This wasn't a subjective beauty judgement - participants were literally seeing the skin as lighter when red was present on the lips. Purple lips had the opposite effect, making the same skin appear darker and duller.

The red-equals-luminosity connection isn't arbitrary - it's rooted in human biology. Research analysing skin tone across different age groups reveals that young, healthy skin contains more red pigmentation than aged skin. Our brains have evolved to associate red tones with youth and health.
This explains the transformative power of blush, red lipstick, and pink-toned clothing near the face. These colours don't just look good - they trigger an unconscious perception of healthier, more youthful skin.
Interestingly, research reveals cultural differences in radiance preferences&mdash;Western beauty ideals favour the warm, red-orange "glow" whilst Asian beauty standards prioritise porcelain perfection with minimal colour saturation. This explains why K-beauty products often contain cooling agents, whilst Western makeup tends toward warm undertones.

Practical Application
Understanding the radiance effect provides a scientific basis for identifying which red-based tones create the optimal glow for your specific colouring. This isn't about matching existing lip or cheek colour&mdash;it's about identifying which red family tones create the most convincing illusion of luminous skin.
The key insight is that this radiance effect can be replicated in clothing. Colours that create the perfect glow when worn as lipstick will often have the same illuminating effect when worn near the face. A coral that makes your skin luminous in lipstick form will likely create similar radiance in a coral jumper or scarf.

This season's colour story validates the new science perfectly. Autumn/Winter 2025's trending palette features rich burgundies, deep teals like "Lyons Blue," warm spice tones in "Brandied Melon," and sophisticated neutrals like "French Roast" brown - colours that happen to align remarkably well with several key eye colour categories.

Medium brown eyes find themselves in perfect harmony with autumn's cognac and chocolate tones. The season's "Cherry Lacquer" - a deep, sensual red&mdash;and rich browns resonate with the red-orange undertones these eyes contain, creating the colour harmony that makes people unconsciously attracted. When medium brown-eyed individuals wear these signature shades, they're leveraging biology, not just following trends.
Hazel eyes present an even more compelling case. These light brown eyes with golden flecks work beautifully with autumn's warm spectrum - from "Lemon Grass" yellows to "Brandied Melon" oranges. The golden flecks in hazel eyes create natural harmony with autumn's spice-toned palette, making them particularly suited to this season's warm, sophisticated colours.
Perhaps most surprisingly, certain blue-grey eyes with prominent yellow rings find unexpected harmony in autumn's "Lyons Blue" - a deeply tinted teal evoking luxury. Traditional analysis might steer these individuals toward cooler palettes, but the research suggests the yellow element in their eyes creates a bridge to these more complex colours.

Autumn's palette becomes even more versatile when hair colour enters the equation. The season's deep, saturated colours like "Neon Flare" red and "Cherry Lacquer" require the high-contrast frame that dark hair provides. A brunette with medium brown eyes can handle autumn's most intense burgundies and deepest teals because their dark hair frame supports these strong colours, whilst their eye colour harmonises with them.
But for the fair-haired, autumn's colours need modification. Blonde or light brown hair requires softer versions of the seasonal palette. Instead of "Cherry Lacquer's" intensity, try a muted wine. Rather than full-strength "Lyons Blue," opt for a gentler sage or dusty teal. The eye colour harmony remains, but the saturation adjusts to work with lighter hair tones.
This explains why some people feel drawn to but overwhelmed by autumn trends. They're responding to the eye colour harmony but need the intensity levels adjusted for their hair colour.

Understanding your personal eye-hair colour equation provides a framework for building an autumn wardrobe that transcends trends. For dark brown eyes with brunette hair, this season's deepest colours - true burgundy, forest green, "Lyons Blue" teal - represent perfect investment pieces that will create harmony and contrast effects regardless of fashion cycles.
For hazel eyes with blonde hair, autumn's "Brandied Melon" and softer versions of "Lemon Grass" provide perfect harmony - warm enough to complement the golden flecks but gentle enough to work with fair hair.
For blue-grey eyes with light hair, look for autumn's more muted offerings - perhaps a dusty version of "Lyons Blue" or soft grey-greens that bridge the seasonal palette with your natural colouring.

Rather than asking "Is this an autumn colour?" the scientific approach asks: Does this colour harmonise with my eye colour? Does the intensity level suit my hair colour? A "French Roast" brown jumper might be perfectly autumn, but if you have blue-grey eyes, it will create colour discord regardless of the season. Conversely, a soft blue might seem wrong for autumn, but if it matches your eye colour and the intensity suits your hair colour, it will make you look better than any theoretically correct autumn shade.

The research points toward a more sophisticated understanding of how colour works in fashion. As trend forecasters note, these colours "can help us navigate the future, as well as express our identity and our values" - but only when they're scientifically matched to your individual colouring.
This autumn, instead of asking whether you're a "true autumn," ask which autumn colours make your eyes look most vibrant, which intensities work with your hair colour, and which tones create the radiance effect you desire. The science of attraction isn't about following someone else's rules&mdash;it's about understanding the mathematics of your own beauty and using that knowledge to curate a palette that makes you genuinely magnetic.

PHOTO: &copy; ROBIN MARCHANT; MODELS REP &amp; SCOUT; BRAND EDITORIAL / REBECCA VALLANCE; CHARLOTTE GAINSBOURG / PHOTO COURTESY OF KERING; REBECCA VALLANCE; SIDNEY SWEENEY / STOCK IMAGE; DARIA PILNITSKAYA @DARIA_PILNITSKAYA; ANASTASIA BOGUSHEVSKAYA @NASTYA_BOG_OFFICIAL; GEORGE TIKHOMIROV @TIKHOMIROVGEORGE; PR

The Science of Attraction: Harvesting Your True Colours

Recommended posts for you

Editorials

ÉCLAT ÉTERNEL

Fashion